Consolidated Reporting and Performance Dashboards
The single most-cited operational complaint inside family offices is that nobody fully trusts the consolidated report.
Key takeaways
- —Consolidation is the symptom; data discipline is the cause.
- —Month-end timing conventions need to be written, not assumed.
- —Alternative assets are where most reporting trust is lost — separate process.
- —Reports should drive decisions, not status meetings.
Consolidated reporting fails along predictable lines: alternative-asset values that lag, custodian feeds that miss intra-month activity, currency conventions that drift between team members, and accounting principles applied inconsistently across periods. The dashboard at the top is a faithful reflection of the data underneath; if the data is not trusted, no amount of dashboard polish fixes the problem.
Working reporting is a discipline upstream of the dashboard. The office writes a reporting policy: timing conventions, valuation policies for illiquid positions, currency translation rules, and reconciliation responsibilities. Alternative assets get their own process (because they cannot follow the same timing as listed positions). Month-end has a defined close, not a moving target. With those upstream practices, the dashboard becomes the natural surface — trustworthy because the data underneath is.
Stay informed
Weekly insights for family office professionals.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.